Julie A. Meckfessel-Poletti v. Workday, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JULIE A. MECKFESSEL-POLETTI, Case No. 2:25-cv-01315-DJC-CSK PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED
WORKDAY, INC., COMPLAINT WITHOUT LEAVE TO
AMEND
Defendant. (ECF No. 4) 16 Plaintiff Julie A. Meckfessel-Poletti, representing herself in this action, has filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”).1 FAC (ECF No. 4). The Court previously granted Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), dismissed the Complaint, and granted leave to amend. (ECF No. 3.) The Court finds that the FAC fails to state a claim, and therefore recommends that the FAC be dismissed without leave to amend. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the court must screen every in forma pauperis proceeding, and must order dismissal of the case if it is “frivolous or malicious,” “fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or “seeks monetary relief against a 26 …