Ciardi
Victor Ciardi v. Ford Motor Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 VICTOR CIARDI, No. 2:25-cv-02353 WBS DMC 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND
FORD MOTOR COMPANY,
16 Defendant.
18 ----oo0oo---- 19 Before the court is plaintiff’s motion to remand. 20 (Docket No. 9-3.) Plaintiff argues that remand is necessary 21 because the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to hear this 22 action, which consists of vehicular warranty claims brought 23 pursuant to California’s Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (the 24 “Song-Beverly Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1790, et seq. (See Docket 25 No. 9-3 at 2, 9-10.) Specifically, plaintiff contends that the
The motion is decided on the papers without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). The scheduled January 5, 2026 hearing on the motion is hereby VACATED. amount-in-controversy requirement established in 28 U.S.C. § 2 1332(a) is not met. (See id. at 11-24.) 3 “Any civil action brought in a State court of which the 4 district courts of the United…