R.S.

R.S. v. Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 30, 2025C103027California660 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/30/25 R.S. v. Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Tehama) ----

R.S., C103027

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 22CI000285)

v.

WATCHTOWER BIBLE AND TRACT SOCIETY

OF NEW YORK, INC., et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

THE COURT:

The parties’ request, as construed, to (1) grant calendar preference and expedite review; (2) vacate and reverse the trial court’s order compelling discovery compliance and for imposition of monetary sanctions against appellants (order (money judgment)1);

“A monetary sanction is immediately enforceable as a judgment, unless the court rules that it is not.” (Newland v. Superior Court (1995) 40…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.