S.T.

S.T. v. C.C. CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 30, 2025C101277California2,522 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mesiwala, J.

Filed 12/30/25 S.T. v. C.C. CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

S.T., C101277

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 19FL05538)

v.

C.C.,

Defendant and Appellant.

Self-represented mother C.C. appeals a child custody order and two child support orders. Child’s father S.T. did not file a respondent’s brief, so we decide mother’s appeal based on the record, the opening brief, and any oral argument by mother. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.220(a)(2); In re Marriage of Riddle (2005) 125 Cal.App.4th 1075, 1078, fn. 1.) Because mother does not meet her burden on appeal, we affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 2019, father filed a petition to establish parental…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.