Gasparyan

United States v. Gasparyan

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 30, 202525-1934California1,324 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 30 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 25-1934 D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellee 2:22-cr-448-JLS-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

EDUARD GASPARYAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Josephine L. Staton, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 8, 2025

Before: M. SMITH, CHRISTEN, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

State and federal law enforcement agencies independently investigated

Defendant-Appellant Eduard Gasparyan for an assortment of crimes. State officials

obtained and executed a warrant to search Gasparyan’s home where they seized

various items including a Rolex watch. Federal prosecutors subsequently prosecuted

Gasparyan, and he pleaded guilty to a federal offense. Gasparyan then moved the

district court under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(g) for an order

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.