Dougherty

Cheryll Dougherty, et al. v. Zynga Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 30, 20253:25-cv-04051California336 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CHERYLL DOUGHERTY, et al., Case No. 25-cv-04051-SI

Plaintiffs,

ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL

v. BRIEFING AND VACATING

HEARING

ZYNGA INC.,

Defendant.

12 Now pending before the Court are multiple motions by defendant Zynga, Inc. in this proposed class action case alleging violations of California consumer law and the federal Video Privacy Protection Act. The Court advises the parties that it is inclined to grant defendant’s motion to transfer venue to the Southern District of New York, in light of the forum selection clause contained in the Take-Two Terms of Service applicable to plaintiffs’ claims. However, the Court finds supplemental briefing from plaintiffs would be helpful. Plaintiffs’ opposition to the motion to compel arbitration or, alternatively, transfer venue focuses almost entirely on the arbitration agreement and devotes only one page to venue question. See Dkt. No. 41. As the ones “seeking to avoid a forum…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.