Doe
John Doe v. United States of America, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOHN DOE, Case No. 25-cv-06482-WHO Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
v. DISMISS AND MOTIONS TO SEAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 21, 23, 24, 27, 32, 34, 35 ll Defendants. ao
Defendants seek to dismiss plaintiff John Doe’s complaint for lack of subject matter
|| jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). Because Doe’s claims cannot be
|| addressed by a district court or are moot, I agree that I lack subject matter jurisdiction over this
A 16 || dispute. Accordingly, defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED.!
BACKGROUND Z Doe is a J national who entered the Or on a B-2 tourist |} visa. See Complaint (“Compl.”) [Dkt. No. 1] at 7. On Doe filed an I-589 asylum 20 Doe also filed two motions to seal, a motion to file a sur-reply, and a motion to appoint a || Mandarin courtroom…