Davis

Derrick Lamar Hairston v. Davis, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 30, 20251:23-cv-01186California587 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DERRICK LAMAR HAIRSTON, Case No. 1:23-cv-01186- -EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

RENEWED MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT

v. OF COUNSEL

DAVIS, et al., Defendants. (ECF No. 11) 15 Plaintiff Derrick Lamar Hairston is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 16 pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 22, 2025, 17 Plaintiff filed a renewed motion for appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 11). 18 Plaintiff filed a previous motion for appointment of counsel on March 4, 2024, (ECF 19 No. 6) which the Court denied without prejudice on March 6, 2024. (ECF No. 7). 20 Plaintiff’s current motion requests an appointment of counsel for voluntarily 21 representation because “…well over 730 days passing without any defendant being served; 22 complaint has not took an official step foreward [sic] in these 2 years; no communication has 23 been established between court and plaintiff to provide any additional information.” (ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.