Bondi

Jose Felix Yunganaula Lucero v. Pamela Bondi, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 29, 20253:25-cv-03675California313 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE FELIX YUNGANAULA Case No.: 3:25-cv-3675-CAB-JLB

LUCERO,

ORDER REQUIRING A BOND

Petitioner, HEARING v.

PAMELA BONDI, et al., 15 Respondents.

17 Pending before the Court is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 18 U.S.C. § 2241 filed by Jose Nevarez Ortiz (“Petitioner”). [Doc. No. 1.] Petitioner asserts 19 he is being detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) without a bond 20 hearing in violation of the Immigration and Nationality Act and the Fifth Amendment. [Id. 21 at 9–10.] On December 26, 2025, Respondents filed a supplemental brief stating that: 22 Petitioner appears to be a member of the Bond Eligible Class certified in 23 Maldonado Bautista v. Santacruz, No. 5:25-CV-01873-SSS-BFM, --- F. Supp. 3d ---, 2025 WL 3288403 (C.D. Cal. Nov. 25, 2025). The Bautista court has entered final judgement as to the Bond Eligible Class. Bautista, 25 ECF No. 94. Accordingly, Respondents acknowledge that Petitioner is detained…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.