Meyer

Keni Mae Meyer v. County of Sonoma, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 30, 20254:24-cv-09056California3,512 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KENI MAE MEYER, Case No. 24-cv-09056-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS

v. Re: Dkt. No. 34 COUNTY OF SONOMA, et al., Defendants.

12 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint.1 Dkt. No. 34. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Keni Mae Meyer initially filed this case in December 2024. See Compl. The Court granted in part Defendants’ first motion to dismiss, and none of Plaintiff’s claims in the original complaint survived the motion to dismiss. See Dkt. No. 32. Out of an abundance of caution, the Court granted leave to amend, and Plaintiff accordingly filed an amended complaint. See FAC. Despite the opportunity to amend, Plaintiff’s case remains largely the same. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.