Pittman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RANDY DEWAYNE PITTMAN, Case No. 25-cv-07557-PCP

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

v.

CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., Defendants.

Pro se plaintiff Randy Dewayne Pittman filed this action against the City of San José and several city officials alleging violations of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. According to Mr. Pittman, the defendants unlawfully failed to ensure his access to an accessible parking spot within 200 feet of his apartment building. Concurrent with his complaint, Mr. Pittman filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, i.e., without paying the otherwise mandatory filing fee to initiate a lawsuit. The Court previously granted that application and, pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1915(e)(2), screened Mr. Pittman’s complaint. See Dkt. No. 17. As the Court explained in that order, Mr. Pittman’s complaint fails to state a claim under either the ADA or Section 504. The Court therefore dismissed the case with …