Hixon

Arjan S. Birak v. Hixon, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 30, 20251:25-cv-01532California1,104 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARJAN S. BIRAK, Case No. 1:25-cv-01532-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

v. ACTION HIXON, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS ACTION, WITHOUT PREJUDICE,

Defendants. FOR FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDER

AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

16 (ECF No. 7)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

18 I. Background Plaintiff Arjan S. Birak (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 12, 2025, the Court issued an order directing Plaintiff to submit a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $405.00 filing fee to proceed with this action. (ECF No. 7.) The Court expressly warned Plaintiff that failure to comply with the Court’s order would result in dismissal of this action. (Id.) The deadline has expired, and Plaintiff has failed to respond to the Court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.