Cisneros

Antonio Alfonso Reyna v. Theresa Cisneros

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 30, 20252:22-cv-02295California1,424 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTONIO ALFONSO REYNA, No. 2:22-cv-2295 KJM CSK P Petitioner, v. ORDER THERESA CISNEROS, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with counsel, filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 5, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 41.) Respondent filed a response. (ECF No. 44.) In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.