Booza

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL D. CAREY, No. 2:24-cv-1717 DC AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER GREGORY BOOZA, Defendant. 16 The court is in receipt of plaintiff’s motion entitled “Motion for Prohibitory Injunction and a Mandatory Injunction,” which the court construes as a motion to appoint legal counsel because appointment of counsel is the only relief clearly requested. ECF No. 37. Plaintiff is incarcerated and is bringing his civil case as a self-represented litigant proceeding in forma pauperis. ECF No. 13. I. Motion Plaintiff’s 37-page motion details a series of grievances related to sending mail from prison to the court, asserting that he was wrongfully charged for postage, and has been experiencing “extreme discrepancies” as an in forma pauperis/pro se litigant attempting to litigate this case from prison. ECF No. 37 at 7. Plaintiff asserts he should not have been charged postage because he is…