Booza

Michael D. Carey v. Gregory Booza, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 30, 20252:24-cv-01717California2,131 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL D. CAREY, No. 2:24-cv-1717 AC PC Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GREGORY BOOZA, et al., Defendants. 16 This case was initially filed on June 17, 2024. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding in this matter pro se, and pre-trial proceedings are accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A First Amended Complaint was filed on July 26, 2024. ECF No. 9. Plaintiff was given permission to proceed in forma pauperis on October 30, 2024, and his initial complaint was rejected for service pursuant to the screening process that accompanies IFP status. ECF No. 13. Plaintiff was granted leave to file a Second Amended Complaint, which he filed on March 14, 2025. ECF No. 20. The undersigned found the Second Amended Complaint sufficient for service as to the sole defendant, Gregory Booza. ECF No. 21. Defendant Booza moves to dismiss…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.