Shaffer

Jimmie Earl Stephens v. J. Shaffer, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 30, 20252:24-cv-01785California757 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JIMMIE EARL STEPHENS, No. 2:24-cv-01785-DC-CSK (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING

J. SHAFFER, et al. PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS, AND DIRECTING

Defendants. PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE FILING FEE

WITHIN 30 DAYS

16 (Doc. Nos. 2, 11)

18 Plaintiff Jimmie Earl Stephens is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 3, 2025, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) (Doc. No. 2) be denied. (Doc. No. 11.) Specifically, the magistrate found Plaintiff’s application should be denied because: (1) he is subject to the three strikes provision under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); and (2) he failed to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.