Joseph Perez v. County of San Joaquin, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH PEREZ, Case No. 2:24-cv-03402-TLN-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, et al., Defendants. 16 17 This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 18 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 19, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings 19 and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that 20 any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No 21 objections were filed. 22 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 23 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 24 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 25 magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). 26 Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and…