(PC)Candler

Steven Ranae Gleen Candler v. John & Jane Does, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 31, 20251:23-cv-00459California355 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN RANAE GLEEN CANDLER, No. 1:23-cv-00459-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. (Doc. 89) JOHN & JANE DOES, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 10, 2025, defendants moved for summary judgment on plaintiff’s claims. (Doc. 85.) On November 6, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations to grant defendants’ motion for summary judgment, finding no genuine dispute of material fact as to whether excessive force was used on plaintiff. (Doc. 89.) The findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice that objections were due in 21 days. (Id. at 10.) The parties were further advised that failure to file objections within the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.