(PC)Purdagone

Roxanne Purdagone v. Officer Greg Rodriguez and Michael Pallares

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 31, 20251:23-cv-01324California465 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROXANNE PURDAGONE, Case No. 1:23-cv-01324-JLT-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL

v. (Docs. 21, 39) OFFICER GREG RODRIGUEZ and

MICHAEL PALLARES,

15 Defendants. 16 Roxanne Purdagone is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel on her First Amended Complaint alleging violation of civil and constitutional Rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 19.) This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. The assigned magistrate judge issued Findings and Recommendations to grant Defendant Pallares’ motion to dismiss with respect to Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment cruel and unusual claim of sexual misconduct (claim one) and Plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment bodily integrity claim (claim two); deny the motion with respect to Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment failure to protect claim (claim three) and Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment supervisory liability claim (claim four); and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.