Rivera

Alexis Rivera v. O'Reilly Auto Enterprises LLC., and Does 1 through 10

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 31, 20251:24-cv-00333California398 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ALEXIS RIVERA, an individual, Case No. 1:24-cv-00333-JLT-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER TO CONSTRUE PLAINTIFF’S v. REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL AS MOTION TO AMEND THE

O’REILLY AUTO ENTERPRISES COMPLAINT TO EXCLUDE THE SECOND

LLC., and DOES 1 through 10, AND THIRD CAUSES OF ACTION

Defendants. (Doc. 47) 14 15 Plaintiff asks this Court to dismiss the second and third claims raised in his Complaint with prejudice. (See generally Doc. 47.) The Ninth Circuit has held that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) cannot be used to dismiss individual claims against defendants, and that Rule 15 provides the proper mechanism to do so. See Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 687 (9th Cir. 2005) (“In the specific context of Rule 41(a)(1), we have held that the Rule does not allow for piecemeal dismissals. Instead, withdrawals of individual claims against a given defendant are governed by [Rule…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.