Coyle

Fred Feleki Martinez v. Coyle

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 31, 20251:24-cv-00958California748 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRED FELEKI MARTINEZ, No. 1:24-cv-00958-JLT-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER CONSTRUING PLAINTIFF’S

OBJECTIONS AS A MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION (Doc. 20) COYLE,

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

Defendant. RECONSIDERATION (Doc. 20) 16 Fred Feleki Martinez is a state prisoner who proceeded pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 19, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge screened the first amended complaint and issued findings and recommendations that this action be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. (Doc. 17.) The Court served the findings and recommendations on Plaintiff and informed him that any objections were due within 14 days. (Id.) The Court further advised Plaintiff that failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of the “right to challenge the magistrate’s factual findings” on appeal. (Id.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.