Woo

Kevin Hagan v. Dr. Grace Woo, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 31, 20251:25-cv-00116California414 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN HAGAN, No. 1:25-cv-00116-JLT-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING

v. THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

DR. GRACE WOO, et al., (Doc. 16) Defendants.

16 Kevin Hagan is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 28, 2025, Plaintiff filed an initial complaint alleging that he was denied proper medical care while incarcerated and that CDCR was retaliating against him for his prior lawsuits. (Doc. 1.) On June 24, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, 20 found that the complaint failed to state any cognizable claims, and gave Plaintiff leave to file an 21 amended complaint. (Doc. 12.) On August 22, 2025, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint 22 (Doc. 15.), which the Court screened and found to fail to state a claim. (Doc. 16.) 23 On October 29, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.