(HC)J.S.

J.S. v. Minga Wofford, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 31, 20251:25-cv-02016California662 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 J.S., No. 1:25-cv-02016-DC-SCR Petitioner, v. ORDER MINGA WOFFORD, et al., Respondents. 16 Petitioner, an immigration detainee who is proceeding through counsel, filed a first amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on December 26, 2025. ECF No. 2. Petitioner has paid the filing fee for this action. The court has conducted a preliminary review of the amended petition pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254. Because petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, respondents are directed to show cause by January 8, 2026 why this case is factually or legally distinguishable from the decisions in Labrador-Prato v. Noem, et al., 1:25-cv-01598-DC-SCR, 2025 WL 3458802 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2025), and Selis Tinoco v. Noem, et al., 1:25-cv-01762-

Rule 1(b) of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.