Roberto Antonio Pernalete Ures v. Warden of the Mesa Verde Detention Facility, et. al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 31, 20251:25-cv-02037California667 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERTO ANTONIO PERNALETE No. 1:25-CV-02037-DAD-DMC

URES,

12 Petitioner, ORDER v.

WARDEN OF THE MESA VERDE

DETETION FACILITY, et. al., Respondents. 17 Petitioner, an immigration detainee who is representing himself, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. However, the docket indicates that Petitioner already paid the required filing fee. See ECF No. 1. Accordingly, the application to proceed in forma pauperis will be denied as moot. The court has conducted a preliminary review of the petition pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254. In light of the complexity of the legal issues involved, the court has determined that the interests of justice require the

Rule 1(b) of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254 allows a district court to apply any or all of the rules…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.