Roberto Antonio Pernalete Ures v. Warden of the Mesa Verde Detention Facility, et. al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 31, 20251:25-cv-02037California667 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERTO ANTONIO PERNALETE No. 1:25-CV-02037-DAD-DMC

URES,

12 Petitioner, 13 ORDER v. 14

WARDEN OF THE MESA VERDE

15 DETETION FACILITY, et. al., 16 Respondents. 17 18 Petitioner, an immigration detainee who is representing himself, filed a petition for 19 a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 together with an application to proceed in 20 forma pauperis. However, the docket indicates that Petitioner already paid the required filing fee. 21 See ECF No. 1. Accordingly, the application to proceed in forma pauperis will be denied as 22 moot. 23 The court has conducted a preliminary review of the petition pursuant to Rule 4 of 24 the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254.1 In light of the complexity of 25 the legal issues involved, the court has determined that the interests of justice require the 26

27 1 Rule 1(b) of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254 allows a district court to apply any or all of the rules…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.