Kai Huang v. Warden of the Golden State Annex Detention Facility, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAI HUANG, No. 1:25-cv-02046-DC-SCR Petitioner, v. ORDER WARDEN OF THE GOLDEN STATE ANNEX DETENTION FACILITY, et al., 15 Respondents.
17 Petitioner, an immigration detainee who is representing himself, filed a petition for a writ 18 of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 together with a motion to proceed in forma 19 pauperis. ECF Nos. 1-2. 20 Examination of the in forma pauperis application reveals that petitioner is unable to afford 21 the costs of suit. Accordingly, the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. See 28 U.S.C. 22 § 1915(a). 23 The court has conducted a preliminary review of the petition pursuant to Rule 4 of the 24 Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254. Because petitioner may be entitled 25 to the requested relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, respondents will
Rule 1(b) of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254 allows a district court to apply any or all of…