Morales

Jesus Gutierrez, Jr. v. Sircoya M. Williams; Christopher Vanning Johnson v. Raul Morales

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 31, 20252:23-cv-00920California568 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JESUS GUTIERREZ, Jr., Case No. 2:23-cv-0712-KJM-JDP (P) Petitioner, v. SIRCOYA M. WILLIAMS, Respondent. 16 CHRISTOPHER VANNING JOHNSON, Case No. 2:23-cv-0920-KJM-JDP (P) Petitioner, v. RAUL MORALES, ORDER Respondent. 22 Petitioners, former codefendants convicted in state court of second-degree murder, have both filed petitions for habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in the related cases captioned above. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 29, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Both petitioners filed objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.