Hill

Raymond George Glass v. James Hill, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 31, 20252:24-cv-03020California762 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND GEORGE GLASS, No. 2:24-cv-03020-DC-CSK (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

JAMES HILL, et al., CASE Respondents. (Doc. Nos. 17, 23) 16 Petitioner Raymond George Glass is a state prisoner proceeding pro se on a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 20, 2025, the magistrate judge issued an order for Petitioner to show cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed as untimely under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”). (Doc. No. 18.) On March 11, 2025, Petitioner filed a motion for release. (Doc. No. 17.) On May 27, 2025, Petitioner filed a response to the magistrate judge’s order. (Doc. No. 21.) On June 4, 2025, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.