Distaso

Sumith Samarakoon v. Richard Distaso, Tracy Toledo, Yvette Allivato and Jennifer Tercerro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 31, 20252:25-cv-01271California7,114 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SUMITH SAMARAKOON, No. 2:25-cv-1271-SCR Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

RICHARD DISTASO, TRACY TOLEDO, YVETTE ALLIVATO and JENNIFER TERCERRO, Defendants. 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action, which was accordingly referred to the undersigned. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), which was granted. ECF No. 9 at 7. The undersigned issued a screening order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and concluded that Plaintiff’s Complaint was legally deficient as to several causes of actions, against various Defendants, and for various requested remedies. Id. at 7-16. The undersigned gave Plaintiff 30 days to amend the Complaint, or alternatively to voluntarily dismiss the Complaint as to Defendants Tracy Toledo, Lea May Sarte, Jennifer Tercerro, and Judge Richard Distaso. Id. at 17. Plaintiff has now filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.