Satnam Singh v. California City Detention Center, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 31, 20252:25-cv-03724California496 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SATNAM SINGH, Case No. 2:25-cv-3724-DJC-JDP (P) Petitioner, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA CITY DETENTION CENTER, et al., 15 Respondents.

17 Petitioner, an immigration detainee who is representing himself, filed a petition for a writ 18 of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court has conducted a preliminary review of 19 the petition pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 20 2254.1 21 In light of the complexity of the legal issues involved, the court has determined that the 22 interests of justice require the appointment of counsel. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B); see also 23 Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). Within seven days of this order, the 24 appointing authority for the Eastern District of California shall identify counsel and send 25 counsel’s contact information to ncannarozzi@caed.uscourts.gov, and counsel will be added as

1 Rule 1(b) of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.