Vazquez-Ramirez
United States v. Vazquez-Ramirez
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-3544 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:22-cr-00087-
RMP-
v.
OSCAR VAZQUEZ-RAMIREZ,
OPINION
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Rosanna Malouf Peterson, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted June 2, 2025 Seattle, Washington
Filed January 2, 2026
Before: Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Daniel A. Bress, and Patrick J. Bumatay, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam Opinion; Concurrence by Judge Bumatay USA V. VAZQUEZ-RAMIREZ
SUMMARY *
Criminal Law
The panel affirmed Oscar Vazquez-Ramirez’s conviction for violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(5)(A), which prohibits persons “illegally or unlawfully in the United States” from possessing a firearm. Vazquez-Ramirez moved to dismiss the indictment, raising an as-applied Second Amendment challenge to § 922(g)(5)(A). The district court denied the motion. The panel concluded that this court’s previous holding that Second Amendment challenges to § 922(g)(5)(A) are subject to intermediate scrutiny, see United States v. Torres, 911 F.3d 1253,…