Staicu

Staicu v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 2, 202625-2328California289 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 2 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SORIN FLORIN STAICU; DARIA No. 25-2328 FLORENTI STAICU; MARIA MIRELA Agency Nos.

STAICU, A240-594-008

A240-594-006

Petitioners,

A240-594-007

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 2, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: R. NELSON, COLLINS, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Sorin Florin Staicu (“Staicu”) seeks review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’s affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s denial of Staicu’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). application for asylum, withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture

relief.1 We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and deny…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.