Staicu
Staicu v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 2, 202625-2328California289 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 2 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SORIN FLORIN STAICU; DARIA No. 25-2328 FLORENTI STAICU; MARIA MIRELA Agency Nos.
STAICU, A240-594-008
A240-594-006
Petitioners,
A240-594-007
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 2, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: R. NELSON, COLLINS, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Sorin Florin Staicu (“Staicu”) seeks review of the Board of
Immigration Appeals’s affirmance of an Immigration Judge’s denial of Staicu’s
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). application for asylum, withholding of removal, and Convention Against Torture
relief.1 We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and deny…