Kaur
Kaur v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 2, 202624-2614California2,288 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
JAN 2 2026
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
HARMEET KAUR; SUMIT KUMAR; No. 24-2614
P.K.,
Agency Nos. Petitioners, A246-269-675
A246-269-674
v. A246-269-676
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
ORDER
Respondent.
Before: HAWKINS, S.R. THOMAS, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.
Respondent Pamela Bondi’s petition for panel rehearing (Dkt. No. 41) is
GRANTED. The final paragraph of the memorandum disposition filed July 18,
2025, is hereby amended to read:
Because none of the adverse credibility grounds that the agency relied on for
either Kaur or Kumar are supported by substantial evidence, we grant the petition
for review and remand on an open record for the agency to redetermine Kaur and
Kumar’s credibility. See Soto-Olarte, 555 F.3d at 1095–96 (remanding on an open
record).
No further Petitions for Rehearing will be entertained.