Kaur

Kaur v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 2, 202624-2614California2,288 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

JAN 2 2026

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

HARMEET KAUR; SUMIT KUMAR; No. 24-2614

P.K.,

Agency Nos. Petitioners, A246-269-675

A246-269-674

v. A246-269-676

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

ORDER

Respondent.

Before: HAWKINS, S.R. THOMAS, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Respondent Pamela Bondi’s petition for panel rehearing (Dkt. No. 41) is

GRANTED. The final paragraph of the memorandum disposition filed July 18,

2025, is hereby amended to read:

Because none of the adverse credibility grounds that the agency relied on for

either Kaur or Kumar are supported by substantial evidence, we grant the petition

for review and remand on an open record for the agency to redetermine Kaur and

Kumar’s credibility. See Soto-Olarte, 555 F.3d at 1095–96 (remanding on an open

record).

No further Petitions for Rehearing will be entertained.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 2 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.