W.H.

W.H. v. K.M. CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 2, 2026D085312California3,344 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rourke, J.

Filed 1/2/26 W.H. v. K.M. CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

W.H., D085312

Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 23FL005272N)

K.M.,

Respondent.

APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Daniel Segura, Judge. Affirmed.

W.H., in pro. per., for Appellant. Law Office of Linda Cianciolo and Linda Cianciolo for Respondent.

Appellant W.H. (Grandfather) filed a Petition for Grandparent Visitation (Petition) seeking court-ordered visitation with his then-6-year-old grandson, B.H. The mother of the child, respondent K.M. (Mother), objected. Grandfather challenges on appeal the denial of his preemptory challenge of the assigned judge, the mislabeling of a pleading he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.