Winston

Winston v. Trate

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 2, 202625-972California406 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 2 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LEANTHONY T. WINSTON, No. 25-972 D.C. No. Petitioner - Appellant, 1:24-cv-00837-JLT-HBK v.

MEMORANDUM*

B. M. TRATE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Jennifer L. Thurston, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2025**

Before: PAEZ, CHRISTEN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner LeAnthony T. Winston appeals pro se from the district

court’s order disregarding his untimely objections to the findings and

recommendation and motion to amend his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). petition.1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The district court did not err by disregarding Winston’s objections and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.