Winston
Winston v. Trate
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 2 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LEANTHONY T. WINSTON, No. 25-972 D.C. No. Petitioner - Appellant, 1:24-cv-00837-JLT-HBK v.
MEMORANDUM*
B. M. TRATE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Jennifer L. Thurston, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 17, 2025**
Before: PAEZ, CHRISTEN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.
Federal prisoner LeAnthony T. Winston appeals pro se from the district
court’s order disregarding his untimely objections to the findings and
recommendation and motion to amend his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). petition.1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.