Walker

Walker v. Gunther

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 2, 202625-1215California355 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 2 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIAN WALKER, No. 25-1215 D.C. No. Petitioner - Appellant, 2:24-cv-03386-SRB-ESW v.

MEMORANDUM*

JASON GUNTHER,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2025**

Before: PAEZ, CHRISTEN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner Julian Walker appeals pro se from the district court’s

judgment dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing de novo, see Lane v.

Swain, 910 F.3d 1293, 1295 (9th Cir. 2018), we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Walker contends the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”)’s policy and practice with

regard to earned…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.