Sandoval

United States v. Sandoval

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 2, 202625-842California382 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 2 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 25-842 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:16-cr-01694-JLS-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

ROBERTO ANTONIO SANDOVAL, AKA

Robert Antonio Sandoval,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Janis L. Sammartino, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2025**

Before: PAEZ, CHRISTEN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Roberto Antonio Sandoval appeals from the district court’s order extending

his supervision term and adding a special condition of supervised release upon his

admission to violating supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1291, and we affirm.

Sandoval contends that the district court denied him due…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.