Morgan

United States v. Morgan

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 2, 202625-2669California262 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 2 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 25-2669 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:17-cr-00064-KJD-EJY-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

JACK WILLIAM MORGAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Kent J. Dawson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2025**

Before: PAEZ, CHRISTEN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Jack William Morgan appeals pro se from the district court’s orders denying

his motions for compassionate release and for a sentence reduction under

Amendment 821 to the Guidelines. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,

and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). As the government argues, and Morgan does not dispute, Morgan did not

file his notice of appeal within 14 days of the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.