Mertens

United States v. Mertens

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 2, 202625-2316California261 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 2 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 25-2316 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:03-cr-00073-DCN-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

ROBERT LEON MERTENS, AKA BJ

Mertens,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho David C. Nye, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2025**

Before: PAEZ, CHRISTEN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Robert Leon Mertens appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying

his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We

dismiss the appeal as moot.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). During the pendency of this appeal, Mertens was released from prison. We

agree with the government that Mertens’s release renders this appeal moot. See

United States v. Yepez, 108…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.