Natkunanathan

Natkunanathan v. USA

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 2, 202624-644California502 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 2 2026

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SIVATHARAN NATKUNANATHAN, No. 24-644 D.C. No. 8:20-cv-01080-DOC-ADS Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES OF

AMERICA; MERRICK B.

GARLAND, Attorney General; CHAD WOLF, Acting Secretary Department of Homeland Security; DONNA CAMPAGNOLO, District Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Los Angeles; JANE ARELLANO; DOES, 1 through 8,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2025**

Before: PAEZ, CHRISTEN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Sivatharan Natkunanathan appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging the wrongful denial of his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.