Loyd
Loyd v. Alvarez
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 2 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DANIEL RAY LOYD, No. 24-2374 D.C. No. 5:21-cv-01817-SPG-SHK Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MEMORANDUM*
V. ALVAREZ, M.D.; W. PAYNE;
BRYANT, Sgt.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Sherilyn Peace Garnett, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 17, 2025**
Before: PAEZ, CHRISTEN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Daniel Ray Loyd appeals pro se from the district
court’s summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies in his
U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his health and safety. We
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Williams v.