James
James v. Flowerdew
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 2, 202625-5454California328 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 2 2026
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PAUL R. JAMES, Jr., No. 25-5454 D.C. No. 3:25-cv-00130-SLG Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MEMORANDUM*
FLOWERDEW, Administration,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Sharon L. Gleason, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 17, 2025**
Before: PAEZ, CHRISTEN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.
Alaska state prisoner Paul R. James, Jr. appeals pro se from the district
court’s order denying his application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in his
U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional claims. We have jurisdiction under
U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s interpretation and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). application of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Andrews v. Cervantes, 493…