Rodrigues

Karla Rodrigues v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 2, 20263:25-cv-05815California1,739 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KARLA RODRIGUES, Case No. 25-cv-05815-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO REMAND

JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH Re: Dkt. No.

AMERICA, LLC,

11 Defendant.

12 Before the Court is Plaintiff Karla Rodrigues’s motion to remand. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court denies the motion to remand, for the following reasons. BACKGROUND According to Rodrigues’s complaint, on or about July 12, 2019, Rodrigues purchased a 2019 Jaguar I-Pace, which was accompanied by express and implied warranties. Dkt. No. 1-2 (“Compl.”) ¶¶ 5, 9-10. The vehicle was delivered with “serious defects and nonconformities.” Id. ¶ 11. Defendant Jaguar North America, LLC has allegedly not cured the vehicle’s shortcomings, and, therefore, Rodrigues is suing for breach of express and implied warranty under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.