Rumiantseva
Ksenia RUMIANTSEVA v. WARDEN OF OTAY MESA DETENTION CENTER
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Ksenia RUMIANTSEVA, Case No.: 25-cv-3844-AGS-DEB Petitioner, ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE v. WARDEN OF OTAY MESA DETENTION CENTER, Respondent. 9 Petitioner Ksenia Rumiantseva seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 to free her from immigration detention. (See ECF 1.) At this stage, she need only make out a claim that is sufficiently cognizable to warrant a response. See Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, Rule 4 (authorizing summary dismissal “if it plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief”); id., Rule 1(b) (permitting application of Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases to any “habeas corpus petition”). In this context, the relevant federal rules permit “summary dismissal of claims that are clearly not cognizable.” Neiss v. Bludworth, 114 F.4th 1038, 1045 (9th Cir. 2024) (cleaned up). But “as long as a petition has any potential merit, it…