Chestnut

Mussie B.Z. v. Christopher Chestnut, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 2, 20261:26-cv-00003California3,765 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 Mussie B.Z.1,

Petitioner, No. 1:26-cv-00003-TLN-DMC

14 v. ORDER Christopher Chestnut, et al., 16 Respondents.

18 This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Mussie B.Z.’s (“Petitioner”) Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) and Preliminary Injunction. (ECF No. 2.) For the reasons set forth below, Petitioner’s Motion is GRANTED in part. The requested TRO is GRANTED — Respondents shall immediately release Petitioner — and Respondents are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why a preliminary injunction should not issue. 24 As recommended by the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of 25 the Judicial Conference of the United States, the Court omits Petitioner’s full name, using only his first name and last initials, to protect sensitive personal information. See Memorandum Re: 26 Privacy Concern Regarding Social Security and Immigration Opinions, Committee on Court Administration and Case Management, Judicial Conference of the United States…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.