Martin

Jonathan Kohut v. M. Martin, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20261:22-cv-00472California6,618 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JONATHAN KOHUT, Case No. 1:22-cv-00472-KES-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S STATE LAW

v. CLAIMS1 M. MARTIN, et al., FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Jonathan Kohut is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis on his First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 13, FAC). On November 10, 2025, the district judge adopted in part the Findings and Recommendations (F&R) issued by the undersigned. (Doc. No. 20). Specifically, the district judge adopted the F&R to the extent the district court found the FAC failed to state a federal conspiracy claim and failed to state a Fourteenth Amendment due process claims related to: (1) the filing of a false disciplinary report (RVR), (2) the lack of sufficient evidence to support a guilty finding of the RVR, and (3) the failure to reverse the guilty finding of the RVR.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.