Patrick

Ramses Nieves v. R. Patrick, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20261:23-cv-01036California560 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAMSES NIEVES, Case No.: 1:23-cv-01036-SKO Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING ORDER ISSUED

DECEMBER 30, 2025

v. (Doc. 29) R. PATRICK, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Ramses Nieves is proceedings pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff failed to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to Defendants Ashby and Patrick’s motions to dismiss. Accordingly, on December 5, 2025, the Court issued its Order to Show Cause (OSC) Why Sanctions Should Not be Imposed for Plaintiff’s Failure to File an Opposition or Statement of Non-Opposition to the Pending Motions to Dismiss. (Doc. 28.) Plaintiff’s response was due in 14 days. (Id.) On December 29, 2025, following no response from Plaintiff, the Court signed the Order Discharging Order to Show Cause and Order Deeming Motions to Dismiss Unopposed and 27 Submitted. (Doc. 29.) The orders were docketed and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.