Snow

Michelle Snow v. Conagra Brands Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20261:22-cv-00699California9,934 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHELLE SNOW, No. 1:22-cv-00699-DC-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

CONAGRA BRANDS INC., (Doc. No. 48) Defendant. 16 This matter is before the court on Defendant Conagra Brands Inc.’s motion for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 48.) Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the pending motion was taken under submission to be decided on the papers. (Doc. No. 61.) For the reasons explained below, the court will grant Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background1 1. Plaintiff’s Employment History with Defendant Defendant is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois and operates a multi-national food manufacturing company. (UF ¶ 1.) Defendant has a written policy prohibiting discrimination,

1 The relevant facts that follow are undisputed unless otherwise noted and are derived from the undisputed facts as stated by Defendant,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.