Baez-Diaz

Francisco Baez-Diaz v. United States of America

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20263:24-cv-02217California2,875 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 FRANCISCO BAEZ-DIAZ, Case No.: 3:24-cv-2217-JES 3:23-cr-1426-JES Petitioner,

v. ORDER:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (1) DENYING PETITIONER’S Respondent. MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE,

OR CORRECT SENTENCE UNDER

17 28 U.S.C. § 2255; and 18 (2) DENYING MOTION TO

COMPEL COUNSEL TO PROVIDE

AFFIDAVIT RESPONSE AS MOOT

21 [ECF Nos. 1, 146, 148]

23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 Before the Court is Francisco Baez-Diaz’ (“Petitioner”) motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (“Motion”), alleging ineffective assistance of counsel by his attorney, Mara Gonzalez Souto (“Gonzalez Souto”). ECF No. 1461. The United States filed an opposition to the Motion and Petitioner filed a reply. ECF Nos. 157, 158. The Court held an evidentiary hearing on October 28, 2025. ECF No. 163. During the evidentiary hearing, the Court heard testimony from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.