(PC)Gomez

Gerardo Gomez v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20261:24-cv-00225California401 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GERARDO GOMEZ, Case No. 1:24-cv-00225 JLT BAM Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

v. ACTION WITH PREJUDICE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF (Docs. 8, 10)

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. 17 The Court screened the complaint and found that it failed to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 and failed to state a cognizable claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 8.) The Court granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint or notice of voluntary dismissal within thirty days. (Id.) Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise communicate with the Court. On December 3, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations that recommended dismissal of this action, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, failure to obey a court order, and for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.