Cooper

Dantea Cooper v. Arizu, Correctional Officer

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20263:25-cv-01793California1,676 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DANTEA COOPER, Case No.: 25-cv-1793-TWR (BJW)

CDCR #BT-9633,

ORDER (1) SCREENING FIRST

Plaintiff, AMENDED COMPLAINT vs. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 13 §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) & 1915A(b) and

(2) DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL TO ARIZU, Correctional Officer,

EFFECT SERVICE PURSUANT TO

Defendant. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) & Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3)

18 On July 9, 2025, Plaintiff Dantea Cooper, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a 19 civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, along with a Motion to Proceed In 20 Forma Pauperis (“IFP”). (See ECF Nos. 1–2.) On September 8, 2025, the Court granted 21 Plaintiff leave to proceed IFP and dismissed the Complaint, which appeared to contain 22 claims for retaliation and cruel and unusual punishment, for failure to state a claim pursuant 23 to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2) & 1915A(b). (See ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff was notified of the 24…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.